When Do You Need to Patent?

 

In our last blog in the Building the Business Case series, we talked about the importance of patents.  I came across the following article in mddionline about patenting for early–stage medtech companies and thought it explained the concept of patents well.

John Baskin states that “Although the costs of obtaining patents can be prohibitive for start-ups, obtaining patent protection is generally necessary as a business tool.”

“Intellectual property (IP) in the form of patents and patent applications often comprises a core asset for start-up companies, particularly those in the medical device and biotechnology industries. These assets may provide the basis for valuations underlying early-equity investments, leverage in negotiations with strategic partners, or ultimately lead to a successful exit for a company. Obtaining solid patent protection is often expensive and can be an arcane exercise for those not familiar with the process. The value of a patent portfolio can be reduced or destroyed by mistakes such as inadvertent public disclosure of confidential information, a lack of appreciation for the difference between patentability and freedom to operate, the inclusion of unclear claim language, or poorly drafted provisional patents. The tension between the need for strong patent protection and a general lack of available financial resources makes IP management for start-up companies a significant challenge for entrepreneurs. It’s important to outline some of the issues pertaining to patenting by biomedical start-up companies, describe ways to mitigate costs, and offer practical tips to ensure the quality of patent applications.”

He goes on to explain patentability. “To obtain a patent, an invention must be novel, nonobvious, and useful.”

Once you decide to file for a patent, you must choose whether to file for a full patent or provisional patent.  A provisional patent expires after 12 months. Within that year-long window, the applicant must convert the provisional patent to a full application in order to preserve the priority date.

The cost of filing a patent in the United States is generally considered to be $10,000–$30,000. However, the filing cost with the USPTO for a provisional patent is generally less than $200 and it is often prepared with only the cursory involvement of a patent agent or lawyer, minimizing the total cost.

Even I, someone who is admittedly unversed in the art of patenting, could understand when and why you would want to obtain a patent after reading this article.

Enhanced by Zemanta

March 19, 2010 – INpact Meeting

Intellectual Property, Patents, and Trademarks

Speakers
Daniel L. Boots, Bingham McHale LLP
Brad Fravel, Indiana University Research & Technology Corporation (tentative)

There will be a speed networking session so be sure to bring plenty of business cards and short list of questions and/or needs!

Time: 11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
Location: Bingham McHale
10 W. Market St.
Suite 2700
Downtown Indianapolis

Cost: Non-members $20. Payment can be made at the meeting. Please make check payable to INpact.

Register here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

March 9, 2010 – IBEN: Intellectual Property

IBEN: Intellectual Property

Where: Riley Outpatient Center (Directions)
When: 2/9/2010 at 5pm

Postponed due to the Winter Storm Warning: STAY SAFE!!! Come join us for an opportunity to ask your questions about Intellectual Property and startup companies. Gain advice from a panel of experts whether you are currently in the patent process or considering making public disclosures including publishing your research.

Cost is free, but registration is required.

Speaker(s):
Dustin DuBois, Partner, Ice Miller’s Business Practice Group
Mark Reichel, Associate, Ice Miller’s IP Practice Group

Moderator(s):
Tom Walsh, Partner & Chair of Ice Miller’s IP Group

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Exit Strategy – More than Just a Buy-Out

In military strategy an exit strategy is used to minimize blood and treasure (lives and material). In business it’s not that much different. Having an exit strategy allows you to:

  1. get out of an unfavorable situation with a pre-crafted plan
  2. achieve an objective worth more than the cost of continuing the organization

When you start a business, determining a long-term plan should near the top of your to-do list.

The most common exit strategy is the sale of your business based on the valuation of your company. However, there are many other strategies and planning a back up strategy is not a bad idea. For examples of other exit strategies, see what Yahoo Small Business says.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

February 9, 2010 – Intellectual Property Discussion

Intellectual Property: A discussion around current trends

Where: Riley Outpatient Center (Directions)
When: 2/9/2010 at 12am

Come join us for an opportunity to ask your questions about Intellectual Property and startup companies. Gain advice from a panel of experts whether you are currently in the patent process or considering making public disclosures including publishing your research.

Cost is free, but registration is required.

Click to Register

Speaker(s):
Dustin DuBois, Partner, Ice Miller’s Business Practice Group
Mark Reichel, Associate, Ice Miller’s IP Practice Group
TBA, TBA

Moderator(s):
Tom Walsh, Partner & Chair of Ice Miller’s IP Group

December 9, 2009 – Bose McKinney & Evans LLP: Intellectual Property Seminar

Software Patent: Oxymoron Or Sound Business Practice?

A Guide For Assessing Whether Patent Protection Is Worthwhile

Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Registration: 2:00 PM
Program: 2:30 – 4:30 PM

Rose-Hulman Ventures
100 South Campus Drive
Terre Haute, IN 47803

Program Description

The debate continues: some argue that software should not be patentable or that patenting software is a waste of money and time.  Others contend that software patents are a valid business practice.  So what’s the best course of action?

As with most things in life, the answer is “it depends.”  During an upcoming seminar, attorneys from the Intellectual Property Group of Bose McKinney & Evans LLP will walk you through a process to help you decide which of your inventions might be eligible for and worthy of patents.

The attorneys will present the criteria that will help you to determine what software is patent eligible and to determine whether patent protection is worthwhile.  For those inventions that meet the criteria, the attorneys will provide practical tips for drafting computer software patent applications to satisfy the requirements for patent eligibility.  The presenters also will discuss copyright protection as an alternative to patents, including the advantages and disadvantages of each.  Finally, the speakers will provide a brief history of software patent eligibility over the years to help illustrate how we arrived at the current confusing state of what should and should not be patented, and will address the impact of the Bilski decision of 2008.

Registration

There is no cost to attend the program, but reservations are required due to limited seating.

Contact: Deidre Jordan
djordan@boselaw.com
317-684-527

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

December 4, 2009 – GIIRT Meeting

GIIRT Roundtable Discussion

The next roundtable will feature Elliott Parker, Principle of Innovo Partners who will share his topic Reinvent:Finding New Uses for Old Inventions. Elliott will explain how to find creative new uses for intellectual property–new applications that solve real, unmet needs. He’ll show how patent data can be used to spark innovation, and how to determine whether customers will adopt or ignore an invention.

Mark your calendars for Friday, December 4 from 11a to 1p and don’t forget to send us an RSVP so we can mark you on our calendars too.  Please send us an email or call Scott at 814-8243 by Wednesday the 25th.

Have you seen the website lately? GIIRT.com has photos, video and highlights from our last meeting posted in the new “past events” section.  The great video from Lieutenant Governor Becky Skillman is also online so check it out.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]